betacorpo.net>>
|
|
3/2/03:A pair of particularly scathing arguments on the illegality of a war on Iraq - Law Professors? Statement on Iraq - Every nation that has ever committed aggression against another claimed to be "defending" itself. The United States helped establish the United Nations precisely in order to impose the rule of law on such claims, to make it unlawful for nations to strike against others unless they were themselves under armed attack. The United States is not under armed attack by Iraq.
Also, Dr. Lawrence Moquera's "A Duty to Disobey All Unlawful Orders: An Advisory to US Troops" is circulating quite a bit lately, unique for addressing the US Military rather than the usual sectors of public opinion (I prefer this particular above link for its useful and equally informative offsite references) -
The reasons for war are not supposed to be the purview of soldiers in the field. They are just supposed to follow orders. But when a war is so blatantly illegal soldiers need to have some background to make an informed decision about how to conduct themselves. In a short space it is not possible to delineate the full reasons, but it is not about the dangers of Saddam Hussein. As indicated above, there are no credible anti-war or peace advocates that advocate any positive statements about Saddam Hussein or the Government of Iraq. The world, however, in general, does not believe that the Bush administration has any solution to the situation. In fact many believe that Bush, himself, is a significant part of the problem. [cheers to consumptive and followMeHere for leading to this essay]
posted by jeremy @ 1:09 AM
|
portfolios:jeremy wellsla mujer gallinapalomarQ:
|
|
|
|
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home